Legal Opinion
Tuman v. Genesis Associates
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1996No. Civil Action 95-272PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Kenneth J. and Joan E. Turnan instituted this suit against two mental health professionals, Defendants Patricia A. Mans-mann and Patricia A. Neuhausel, and their corporate practice, Defendant Genesis Associates, alleging that Defendants breached a contract and committed various tortious acts in treating Plaintiffs’ daughter, Diane Tu-rnan, a non-party to this action. 1 Presently before the Court are Defendants Neuhausel’s and Genesis Associates’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 as to the claims against them, and Defendant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Rome v. GlantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Mansmann v. TumanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Lujan v. MansmannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Dole Fresh Fruit Co. v. Delaware Cold Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.