Legal Opinion
Mansmann v. Tuman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1997No. Civil Action 96-5252PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
This lawsuit, brought in diversity, resulted from a prior suit in which Plaintiff, Patricia Mansmann (“Mansmann”), was a defendant, and Defendants Joan and Kenneth Turnan (“the Tumans”) were plaintiffs who were represented by attorneys, Defendants Gary Ginsberg (“Ginsberg”) and Joseph Rizzo (“Rizzo”). In that suit, the Tumans alleged that the defendants, while providing psychological counselling to their daughter, had implanted in her mind false memories of satanic rituals they her parents had supposedly performed and that they had encouraged their daughter to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Mruz v. Caring, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Sarsfield v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.