Legal Opinion
Lujan v. Mansmann
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1997No. Civil Action 96-5098PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Brooke Lujan, brings this action against (1) her former psychologist, Patricia A. Mansmann, (2) her former addiction counselor, social worker Patricia A. Neuhausel, and (3) Genesis Associates, the corporation that employs Mansmann and Neuhausel (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Defendants”). 1 Defendants file, for the Court’s consideration, motions to dismiss certain claims in Lujan’s Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Matthew Madonna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Tabas v. TabasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Christidis v. First Pennsylvania Mortgage TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Calkins v. Dollarland, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Biddle v. Warren Gen. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Johnson v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Viola v. A. & E TELEVISON NETWORKSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.