Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Glanton

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1997No. Civil Action 96-5284PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 1997, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ and defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, and the responses and replies thereto, and after a hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the said motions are GRANTED.

I. Factual Background

While satellite disputes have not been lacking in the course of this litigation, the central dispute involves a potential exhibition of one of the most renowned art collections in the world. The Barnes Foundation was chartered in 1922, and between 1922 and 1992, the works in the collection did not…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Bucci v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API