Legal Opinion
Kaminski v. Chicago River & Indiana R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 5, 1953No. 10603_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEGAN, Circúit Judge.
Appellant, Chicago River and Indiana Railroad Company, defendant below, seeks a reversal of a judgment for $50,000 based on a verdict against it in an action brought by plaintiff-appellee under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. It contends that the trial court erred in denying motions to direct a verdict for the defendant made at the close of plaintiff’s case and after the close of all the evidence; that there was like error in denying its motion for' judgment non ob-stante veredicto. It is further urged that the District Court erred in its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Raymond L. Sears v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Lawrence M. Miller v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.