Lawrence M. Miller v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff entered upon a jury verdict of $24,000. The action was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Title 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-60. Defendant-appellant railroad asserts that a verdict, should have been directed for it, contending that the proofs did not present a jury question as to negligence or proximate cause. The District Judge held that the issue of proximate cause was for the jury and that, applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, so also was defendant’s negligence. He denied defendant’s, motions for a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Robert C. Aparicio v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Irina Tesoriero v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Redmond v. BaxleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.