Legal Opinion

Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1950No. 23PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The Federal Safety Appliance Acts require railroad cars used in interstate commerce to be equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact.1 This case brings before us for review another action for damages by a railroad employee under the Safety Appliance Acts and the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.2 The trial court instructed the jury that there could be no liability based on any “defect” in the “automatic coupling system,” but submitted the case on issues of negligence. There was a verdict against the plaintiff upon which judgment for the railroad was entered. The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API