Legal Opinion

Houplin v. Stoen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1967No. 38804PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action to quiet title; it involves a boundary dispute between adjacent landowners. Plaintiff’s property is in the south portion of the S.W. 1/4 of section 3, township 27 north, range 6 E.W.M. in Snohomish County. It is adjacent to and north of defendant Myers’s property, which is in section 10 in the same township and range.

It is not necessary to burden this opinion with a detailed description of the land. A written stipulation lays the factual foundation for the legal question involved. The parties stipulated (a) that the true section line between their properties is a line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Tyree v. GosaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Skov v. MacKenzie-Richardson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dibirt v. BoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Muench v. OxleyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Heriot v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Johnson v. JarrettMontana Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API