Lamm v. McTighe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
A boundary dispute between adjoining property owners resulted in this appeal.
Plaintiffs (respondents) are the owners of a 5-acre tract of land adjoining and lying west of a similar 5-acre tract owned by defendants (appellants). The north-south line between the respective properties is the boundary in question. Plaintiffs assert the line to be approximately 15.5 feet easterly of where defendants contend it to be. Since the properties are both 660 feet in depth the disagreement involves ownership to a strip of ground approximately 15.5 feet wide by 660 feet deep, running north and south. When…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hollingbery v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Scott v. SlaterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Lumber Mart Co. v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Merriman v. CokeleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Merriman v. CokeleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Trappett v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Lee v. KonradAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.