Legal Opinion

Skov v. MacKenzie-Richardson, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1956No. 33433PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is a suit in equity to re-establish a boundary which, according to the allegations of the complaint, had become lost or obscure, instituted under the provisions of Laws of 1886, §§ 1 and 2, pp. 104, 105 [cf. RCW 58.04.020, 58.04.030]. The respondents are the owners of the northwest quarter of section 8, and the appellant is the owner of the northeast quarter of section 7, township 15 north, range 38 east, W. M., Adams county, Washington. The appellant denied that the boundary had become lost or obscure and affirmatively alleged that it had been fixed and certain for a period of more than…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WynnWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Doss v. SchullerWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Detrick v. Garretson Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nelson v. MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bohnsack v. KirkhamWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. Basin Development & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API