Legal Opinion

Heriot v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 9, 1983No. 5278-4-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

This boundary dispute concerns the ownership of a narrow, wedge-shaped parcel of land located on the north bank of the Columbia River in Pacific County. State Route 401 divides the contested area into north and south portions. The neighbor residing to the west (Heriot) bases his claim to the parcel on the results of a survey conducted in December 1979. The easterly neighbor (Lewis) asserts ownership by operation of the doctrines of (1) adverse possession and (2) boundary by acquiescence. The contested area, depicted in the sketch, lies between the old fence line and the eastern boundary of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. Mecca Twin Theater & Film Exchange, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schoonover v. Carpet World, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Double L Properties, Inc. v. CrandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Evans v. HogueOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Deyong Management, Ltd. v. PrevisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API