Legal Opinion
Houghton v. Sealy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 22, 1927No. 17266PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY, C.
This was an action commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by the Magnolia Petroleum Company, as plaintiff, against O. E. Houghton, defendant, on a promissory note in the sum of $12,-000, and for the foreclosure of á mortgage on certain lots in the city of Skiatook. By! permission, of the court, Julia Haas intervened in said action, and filed an answer and cross-petition. By her cross-petition, she alleged that defendant had executed to her a mortgage on the same real estate included in plaintiff’s mortgage to secure a note in the sum of $5,000>, and asked that her mortgage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Grayson v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- In Re Wah-Shah-She-Me-Tsa-He's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Barrows v. CassidySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Walker v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Berg v. WillibeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Scott v. AmisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kelly v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.