Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Dill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Robert Rainey, Judge. Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against W. II. Hill and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed. brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On September 23, 1907, H. W. Spaulding, F. E. Spaulding, and E. Ii. Spaulding, partners under the firm name of the Spaulding Manufacturing Company, plaintiff in error, sued II. W. Dill, II. G. Mellot, and M. W. Krause in the United States Court for the Indian Territory, Southern District, at Ada. The complaint substantially states that defendants theretofore were “incorporated under the laws of the Indian Territory .under the act of Congress of February 18, 1901, under the name of the Citizens:l Bank & Trust Company of Stonewall, I. T.,” and thereafter engaged in a general banking business in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hughes v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Yerkes v. McGuireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler LinotypeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wade v. Hope & KillingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Houghton v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.