James v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The writ of error required the three cases to be returned to this court. In its brief the state argues the writ of error should be dismissed because this court cannot review three judgments in separate cases on one writ of error although this is done in respect to counts in a single case. We have this day in Ronzani v. State, ante, p. 512, 129 N. W. (2d) 143, decided that the irregularity of attempting to have several judgments of conviction or sentencing entered in separate cases reviewed by a single writ of error may, under sec. 269.51 (1), Stats., be waived by failure to make a timely…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Burnett v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Ronzani v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. GarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Guthrie v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KnoblockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969