State v. Garner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
Garner claims he was entitled to a new judge at his second revocation hearing, either by virtue of sec. 971.20, Stats., or because Judge Seraphim should have disqualified himself for actual bias and prejudice. Prior to the adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code, it was necessary to file an affidavit of prejudice in a criminal suit, but by virtue of sec. 971.20, effective July 1, 1970, an accused may disqualify a judge and obtain a substitute judge without alleging prejudice. However, this right is a pretrial right and must be exercised “before making any motion or before arraignment.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Inman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. TarrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.