State v. Strickland
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurRie, C. J.
Defendant’s motion for new trial did not state that he desired to change his pleas of guilty. Both defendant and the state, however, treat his motion as one to withdraw his pleas in view of Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis. (2d) 138, 141, 126 N. W. (2d) 625. Although an application for leave to withdraw a plea is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the court such withdrawal would be a matter of right if the applicant established a denial of a relevant constitutional right. Van Voorhis v. State (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 217, 223, 131 N. W. (2d) 833.
Defendant here contends that his motion to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Hayes v. StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.