Legal Opinion

Ronzani v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The state urges that the instant writ must be dismissed for the reason that there were two separate judgments of conviction and there is only one writ of error seeking a review of both of said judgments. Montgomery v. American Central Ins. Co. (1900), 106 Wis. 543, 545, 82 N. W. 532. We consider that this defect is cured in the instant case by sec. 269.51 (1), Stats., which provides that when an appeal is attempted and a return is duly made, the respondent who has not moved to dismiss the appeal shall be deemed to have waived all objections to the regularity of the appeal. Ford v. Rothwell…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ferry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Fox v. KoehnigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ford v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. SparrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Whalen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API