Legal Opinion

Paul v. Palm Springs Homes, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1961No. Civ. 6542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

In an amended complaint, plaintiff and respondent John Ronald Paul sought judgment against defendants and appellants Palm Springs Homes Incorporated and Pauline K. Boltz and defendants Walker Boltz, individually and doing business as Palm Springs Homes, Inc., and also doing business as Annandale Corporation, which was alleged to be the alter ego of defendants F. Walker Boltz and Pauline K. Boltz. In the first count, plaintiff alleges that defendants executed and delivered to plaintiff a certain promissory note attached to the complaint in the sum of $37,500, and that there is a balance due…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estudios, Proyectos e Inversiones de Centro America, S.A. v. Swiss Bank Corporation (Overseas) S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Pearl v. ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Metric & Inch Tools, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Stotland v. Mobile Homes Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Epica v. Swiss Bank Corp.(overseas) SaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API