Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Shore

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1971No. Civ. 37050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant-respondent, entered pursuant to the granting of a “motion to strike and dismiss” the plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. Out of nine plaintiffs, only Mr. Pearl has chosen to appeal the trial court’s determination, which, we also add, relates only to the single defendant, Mr. Shore, and not to the various other defendants named in the instant action.

On December 20, 1963, the plaintiff became involved in a limited partnership investment whereby nine limited partners invested a total of $60,000, $30,000 of which was…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bonus-Bilt, Inc. v. United Grocers, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. D'Elia v. Rice Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  4. Bell v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API