Schwind v. Floriston Pulp and Paper Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is for damages brought by respondent for the death of his minor son.
The complaint alleges that “on July 31, 1901, the said Joseph Schwind, minor son of the plaintiff herein, was in the employ of the defendant corporation in the electrical department thereof. That on said day, and at the times hereinafter mentioned, and for a long time prior thereto, the defendant operated and maintained a railroad track that was situated and placed parallel to, and a short distance from, the factory building owned and operated bydt at Floriston. That upon said track, as aforesaid, the defendant, at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Daves v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Young v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
- Wallace v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Warren v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950