Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Pinchin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887No. 12,015PublishedCited by 47 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The facts found by the jury in answer to *593interrogatories are substantially these : The appellee was injured while attempting to pass between two coal cars forming part of a train standing across a street in the town of Butler. He knew that the train was a through freight, bound west, and on approaching the train he stopped to the south of it five or six feet and stood there from five to eight minutes Before he attempted to pass between the cars. He did not know that an engine was attached to the train, but he did not go towards the head of the train to see whether there was an engine…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. City of Indianapolis v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API