Legal Opinion
Raddatz v. Standard Register Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1999No. Civil 4-96-822 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER MEMORANDUM AND OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
This action arises out of defendant Standard Register Company’s (“Standard”) termination of plaintiff Terrance L. Raddatz. Raddatz, who was fifty-two years old when he was terminated, alleges Standard removed him on account of his age, in violation of the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq. (“ADEA”), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 363.01, et seq. (“MHRA”).
This matter is before the Court on Standard’s motion for summary judgment. Standard argues…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ronell Williams v. Lindenwood UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Graham v. Rosemount, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Dong Van Nguyen v. Dobbs International Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
- Fultz v. B.A. Mullican Lumber & Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
- Ronell Williams v. Lindenwood Univ.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002