Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Stephan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1915No. Crim. No. 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The petitioner was imprisoned on a charge of having violated the provisions of the act entitled, “An act to define personal property brokers and regulate their charges and business, ’ ’ enacted April 16, 1909, and amended April 21, 1911. (Stats. 1909, p. 969; Stats. 1911, p. 978.) He asks a release from custody on the claim that the law is unconstitutional.

Section 1 of the law provides that every person “engaged in the business of loaning or advancing money” on the secur ity of chattel mortgages or other contracts by which personal property is hypothecated as security for such loan and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ex parte LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. StokesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re HalckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API