Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose De Jesus Flores Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1992No. 91-30096PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the United States of an order suppressing a statement that defendant Jose Flores Martinez made to federal investigators. The central issue is whether Martinez’s request for counsel in his state proceedings prohibited a subsequent interrogation by federal officials outside the presence of counsel after the state charges were dismissed. We conclude that the resolution of this question depends on the degree of cooperation between federal and state authorities, which is not clear from the record before us. We therefore remand.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. United States v. John Mapp and Kevin MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Dean Martin ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API