Legal Opinion
Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1992No. 91-16631PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
In petitioning this court for a writ of habeas corpus, Edgar M. Hendricks alleges numerous constitutional errors with respect to his conviction for murder, sentence of death, and habeas corpus appeal. All but one of Hendricks' claims are unavailing. Because we find that the district court erred in failing to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing with , respect to Hendricks’ ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we remand this case for a hearing on that claim.
Hendricks committed the San Francisco murders which are the subject of this petition in late 1980. In September of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hendricks v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jerry Bartlett JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.