Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsey Nichole Houghton

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided October 25, 2012No. 02-11-00375-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. Introduction

The State appeals from the trial court’s written order granting Appellee Lindsey Nichole Houghton’s motion to suppress evidence. The State argues in two points that the trial court erred by granting Houghton’s motion to suppress because reasonable suspicion supported the traffic stop of Houghton’s vehicle. Houghton has not filed a brief on appeal. We affirm.

II. Background

Houghton was charged with driving while intoxicated and filed a written motion to suppress. Officer Mark Epps was the only witness who testified at the suppression hearing. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Royce Love v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Leming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Heckadon v. CFS Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Royce Love v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API