Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2015No. 35,116; Docket No. 32,516PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

This case presents a new wrinkle on reasonable suspicion. The arresting officer testified that Defendant ran a stop sign and came to a stop in the middle of the intersection, blocking his lane of travel. However, the dashboard camera in the officer’s police car demonstrated that this was not the case. The district court found that the officer exaggerated, at least, and gave no credence to the officer’s testimony. Nevertheless, relying on the dashboard camera video, the district court found that the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Defendant and denied Defendant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. State v. HubbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. KennedyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. SernaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. SuttonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API