Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. Custin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1938No. 26,981PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

—This is an action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of appellant. The complaint alleged that on June 1, 1934, appellant was engaged in the retail grocery business in the city of Valparaiso; that appellee was a customer; that about 5:45 o’clock in the afternoon, daylight savings time, appellee entered appellant’s store for the purpose of making purchases; that the store was about twenty feet in width, with an offset three and one-half feet wide and twelve feet long on the left-hand side; that the entrance to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stamets v. MitchenorIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Ellis v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hutchins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Van Orden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. J. C. Penney, Inc. v. KellermeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API