Hutchins v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
— The appellant was convicted in the circuit court of the crime of rape.
He assigns as error on this appeal, that the court overruled his motion for a new trial.
Among the reasons urged in favor of the motion was alleged misconduct on the part of the deputy prosecuting attorney and also on the part of one of the jury.
The first charge of misconduct was that the deputy prosecuting attorney, who assisted the State in the prosecution of said cause, after the jury had been charged and sent out by the court in the custody of a sworn bailiff to consult as to their verdict, held a private conversation…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Penn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Burton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Parr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.