Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Hendricks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1891No. 14,916PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee was a passenger on one of the trains of the appellant; the train in which he took passage was thrown from the track and he was severely injured. The appellant’s employees ran the train against a cow which *463had entered upon the track, and the collision caused the train to leave the rails.

A witness who had lived near the railroad and had often seen trains in motion was permitted to give an opinion as to the rate of speed at which the train was running at the time the cow was struck. In this ruling there was no error. A non-expert witness may give an opinion as to the speed at which…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. SheeksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Stamets v. MitchenorIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. CustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API