Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1982No. 1282S468PublishedCited by 267 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRENTICE, Justice.
The defendant issued its policy of insurance denominated a “Farmowner’s Policy,” by the terms of which it insured the plaintiff, as follows:
“ * * * does insure the insured named * * * to the extent of the actual cash value of the property at the time of loss, but not exceeding the amount which it would cost to repair or replace the property with material of like kind and quality * * * against all direct loss by fire * *
The contract (policy) consisted of the basic form known in the industry as “The 1943 New York Standard Form” and also as an “Actual Cash Value Form,” which…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975
- Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.