Legal Opinion
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 31, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-588 MMSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff-patentee Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New Jersey, with its principal place of business in Rah-way, New Jersey. Pretrial Order, Dkt. 53', at 5 (“Pretrial Order”). The defendant Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. (“Danbury”), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Danbury, Connecticut. Id.
On October 31, 1986, Danbury filed an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) with the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- BMO Bank N.A. v. Kular Transportation IncDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.