Legal Opinion
Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 1, 1993No. CV 90-3006 (ADS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this patent infringement action, defendants have filed an amended answer and *494counterclaim pleading in greater specificity their allegation that plaintiffs violated their duty of candor to the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Defendants allege that plaintiffs’ inequitable conduct render the patent in-suit unenforceable. To support this defense, defendants seek to depose certain individuals involved in the prosecution of the patent in-suit. Specifically, defendants seek to continue the deposition of plaintiffs’ (a) outside patent counsel and (b)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995