Legal Opinion
BMO Bank N.A. v. Kular Transportation Inc
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 28, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01568Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-01568-JLT-SAB 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING GRANTING 14 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITH REDUCTION IN 15 KULAR TRANSPORTATION INC., et al., ATTORNEY’S FEES 16 Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WITHIN THREE DAYS 17 (ECF No. 11) 18 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 19 DAYS 20 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default 21 judgment. Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendants…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.