Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 10, 1944No. 142-146, 148, 150-155PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Indictments were returned charging a large number of defendants with violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 904(a) and 925(b). Motions to quash and demurrers have been filed. For present purposes, twelve typical indictments are selected. Determination of their legal sufficiency should be dispositive of the same questions lurking in the remaining indictments. Defendants in all of the cases, except certain individuals doing business as Sussex Poultry Company, are charged with having sold poultry in violation of applicable Regulations.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Fontana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Jarl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. StraughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. United States v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Bowles v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  4. United States v. LefkoffDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  5. United States v. North American Van Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API