Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1947No. 10264PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The judgment challenged in the present appeal is for so-called penalties pursuant to the Agricultural Adjustment Act as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., imposed upon the appellant for marketing excess quota cotton in the years 1940, 1941 and 1942. Subordinate questions involve interest upon the judgment and interest from the time the penalties should have been remitted to the Secretary of Agricul*836ture, such interest having been included and provided for in the judgment.
The Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1341 et seq., provides that not later than November IS of each .year the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marshfield Steel Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Energy Mgt. P 26,436 United States of America v. Uni Oil, Inc., Thomas M. "Mick" HajecateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Jonco Aircraft Corp. v. FranklinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.