Legal Opinion

United States v. Armour & Co. of Delaware

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 4, 1943No. 16084-16086PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALEY, District Judge.

Three indictments have been returned against the defendants in these cases. Two of the indictments (Criminal Nos. 16084 and 16086) are for violations by the defendant, Armour & Company of Delaware, of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 901 et seq. The third indictment (Criminal No. 16085) was returned against Armour & Company of Delaware and others alleging- conspiracy to violate the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942. To these indictments the defendants have filed demurrers and motions to quash. The indictments against the corporate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. United States v. George F. Fish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  5. Bowles v. Cudahy Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API