Legal Opinion
Cowles v. Cowles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 9, 2002No. AC 22107; AC 22108PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this consolidated appeal is whether there is evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that the plaintiffs counsel agreed to further waive the provisions of General Statutes § 51-183b beyond the time specified in the parties’ previously stipulated agreement. We conclude that the court’s finding of waiver was clearly erroneous and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
On June 18, 1998, the plaintiff filed a dissolution action, seeking alimony, counsel fees and the distribution of the marital assets. A three day trial was held…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Frank v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Majernicek v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Building Supply Corp. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Jordan v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Foote v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bramwell v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Santos v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Bonito v. BonitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.