Legal Opinion

Bramwell v. Department of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 20, 2004No. AC 22961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The plaintiff, Retinella Bramwell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant in the plaintiffs action alleging racial *485discrimination, negligent infliction of emotional distress and retaliation by the defendant department of correction. The plaintiff asserts that the court improperly denied her motion for a mistrial and for a new trial pursuant to General Statutes § 51483b1 because it was required to rule on the defendant’s motion for judgment of dismissal within 120 days of the date that the last brief was filed pertaining to that motion,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frank v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Smith v. YurkovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Joyell v. Commissioner of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Cowles v. CowlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. TutsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. O.J. Mann Electric Services, Inc. v. Village at Kensington Place Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Bonito v. BonitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Abele Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Sono Stone & Gravel, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API