Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 18, 2017No. Consol. 16-00157PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Restani, Judge:

OPINION

This action challenges the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Cdmmerce”)’s final results rendered in the second administrative review of the countervailing duty (“CVD”) order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (“solar cells”), from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), covering the period of January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Guizhou Tyre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  4. Risen Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  5. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API