People v. McCarty
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. B. H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The defendant was convicted ■ of the crime of burglary in the first degree, and appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
There was no error committed by the court in allowing the witness, Auble, to remain in the courtroom during the examination of witnesses. The exclusion of witnesses during the time in which the evidence is being placed before the jury is a matter largely in the discretion of the trial court. Ho abuse of that discretion is disclosed here. (People v. Hong Ah Duck, 61 Cal. 387.)
It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Hong Ah DuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by16 opinions
- Loose v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Pueblo v. Torres PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- People v. GarbuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. HanzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.