Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Carella

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1961No. Crim. 1545PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The defendants Carella, Krausniek and Buxton, who are the appellants herein, by indictment were charged with felonies involving bookmaking; Count One in the indictment charged all of the defendants with a conspiracy to violate section 337a of the Penal Code, i.e., engaging in bookmaking, keeping a room for gambling paraphernalia and the making of bets, receiving and holding money in connection with wagers, recording and registering bets and wagers upon certain contests, and accepting bets and wagers on certain contests; Counts Two and Three respectively charged the defendants Carella and…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. State v. CarboneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. People v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API