Legal Opinion

Holvick v. Black

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The defendant John E. Black is the father of the defendant Frank J. Black and they are known hereafter as father and son with reference to their own personal relations. On January 20, 1920, the father was the owner of the real estate involved herein and on that day gave a mortgage thereon to the State Bank of Berthold to secure his note to the bank for $1,500, due December 1, 1920 and payable at the bank. This mortgage was duly recorded April 17, 1920. The note was not paid and on January 30, 1923 he executed a demand note for like amount, also payable at the bank. On February -20, 1923 the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bjorkstam v. Federal Land BankWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Henniges v. PaschkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Robinson v. SwensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Geel v. ValiquettMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Putnam v. BrotenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Thompson v. State Bank of LisbonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Worrell v. Federal Land Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API