Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Broten

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to a quarter section of land in Griggs County in this state. The ultimate question involved is one of priority of mortgages. All rights asserted in the suit are predicated upon certain mortgages executed by the defendant John Broten, who, it is admitted, became the owner in fee of the premises in question on June 29, 1921, by virtue of a warranty deed, executed and delivered to him by the then owner. Three mortgages are involved and give rise to the questions in controversy here.

The first mortgage was executed by John Broten and his wife to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Henniges v. PaschkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Holvick v. BlackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Federal Land Bank v. SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eakman v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Advance Realty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Oakes v. Michigan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API