Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State Bank of Lisbon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, J-

This is a statutory action to quiet title. The defend^ ant State Bank -of Lisbon answered. The other defendants defaulted. Tbe bank set up a certain mortgage covering the real property involved, and of which it was tbe assignee of record.

Tbe facts, briefly stated, are as follows: Plaintiff bought a farm from one Carlson and gave Carlson a note for $3,975, as part of tbe purchase price, secured by a mortgage on the farm. Carlson owed tbe bank. He pledged Thompson’s note and mortgage as collateral to this indebtedness and gave an assignment of tbe mortgage to tbe bank. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brynjolfson v. OsthusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. AinslieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Holvick v. BlackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Clark v. HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ott v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API