Legal Opinion

People v. Eckard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 2011No. B224292PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

Defendant Adam Lee Eckard appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of indecent exposure and found to have had a prior indecent exposure conviction. Defendant contends his prior Washington state misdemeanor indecent exposure conviction did not render him subject to felony sentencing under Penal Code section 314. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) We conclude that an out-of-state indecent exposure conviction that would have been a misdemeanor indecent exposure if committed in California does not trigger the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. NettlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. Orozco, California Court of Appeal, 4th District2016
  3. Bitner v. Dept. of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. People v. Montoya CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. NettlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API