Legal Opinion

People v. Orozco

California Court of Appeal, 4th District

Decided January 21, 2016No. D067313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, Acting P.J.

In this case, we are asked to interpret Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act of 2014. Specifically, we are asked to determine if Proposition 47 applies to crimes that are not specifically enumerated in the law itself. Under the specific circumstances before us, we conclude that it does not.

Ernest Orozco pled guilty to one count of unlawfully driving a vehicle of another without permission ( *542Veh.Code, § 10851, subd. (a) ), and one count of receiving a stolen vehicle ( Pen.Code,1 § 496d ). He contends the trial court erred in denying his petition to reduce both of his felony…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API