Legal Opinion

People v. Nettles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 2015No. C073336PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOCH, J.

Defendant Garyon Tracy Nettles, an inmate serving an indeterminate life sentence imposed pursuant to the three strikes law (Pen. Code, §§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)), 1 appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to recall his sentence and for resentencing under section 1170.126, which became effective November 7, 2012, after the voters approved Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (§§ 667, 1170.12, 1170.126; Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 2012); Proposition 36 or the Act).

Section 1170.126 “created a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. YearwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. SoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jewish Community Centers Development Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Lopez v. LedesmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Cooley CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API