Legal Opinion

People v. Eddie M.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2003No. S109902PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

At the March 7, 2000, Primary Election, California voters approved Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998 (Proposition 21). Proposition 21 operated, among other things, to amend juvenile court procedures, including Welfare and Institutions Code section 777. As configured since 1986, section 777 allowed a more restrictive disposition for a person who, while already on juvenile probation for a criminal offense adjudicated under section 602, violated that probation by committing new misconduct.

As pertinent here, Proposition 21 revised section…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. TrujequeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. W.B.California Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. Julian R.California Supreme Court · 2009

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API