Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1991No. Docket Nos. S014994, S014994PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

—Three former branch office managers of a national bank brought suit seeking damages under California law for the bank’s alleged wrongful termination of their employment. The bank contends their state law causes of action are preempted by the National Bank Act of 1864, which provides that a national bank’s “officers” serve at the pleasure of its board of directors. (12 U.S.C. § 24, Fifth & Sixth; the National Bank Act *1086will also be referred to as the Act, and section 24 will be referred to as section 24 or the statute.) We consider two issues: (1) were plaintiffs “officers”…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stevenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. California School Employees Ass'n. v. Governing Board of the Marine Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API